IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v24y2015i6p661-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Sources for Evidence-Based Practice in Rheumatology Nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Margit Neher
  • Christian StÃ¥hl
  • Per-Erik Ellström
  • Per Nilsen

Abstract

As rheumatology nursing develops and extends, knowledge about current use of knowledge in rheumatology nursing practice may guide discussions about future knowledge needs. To explore what perceptions rheumatology nurses have about their knowledge sources and about what knowledge they use in their practice, 12 nurses working in specialist rheumatology were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. The data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis. The analysis yielded four types of knowledge sources in clinical practice: interaction with others in the workplace, contacts outside the workplace, written materials, and previous knowledge and experience. Colleagues, and physicians in particular, were important for informal learning in daily rheumatology practice. Evidence from the medical arena was accessed through medical specialists, while nursing research was used less. Facilitating informal learning and continuing formal education is proposed as a way toward a more evidence-based practice in extended roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Margit Neher & Christian StÃ¥hl & Per-Erik Ellström & Per Nilsen, 2015. "Knowledge Sources for Evidence-Based Practice in Rheumatology Nursing," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 24(6), pages 661-679, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:661-679
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773814543355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773814543355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773814543355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:24:y:2015:i:6:p:661-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.