IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v24y2015i5p468-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concept Analysis of Burden in Caregivers of Stroke Survivors During the Early Poststroke Period

Author

Listed:
  • Eeeseung Byun
  • Lois K. Evans

Abstract

It is important to understand burden in caregivers of stroke survivors during the early poststroke period if we are to prevent or decrease the longer-term experience of caregiver burden and its consequences. This article reports a concept analysis of burden in caregivers of stroke survivors during the early poststroke period. A literature review using MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases (1960-2014) identified 32 relevant articles published from 1993 to 2013. Rodgers’s evolutionary method of concept analysis was used. Three attributes—objective and subjective aspects, time spent caring for the stroke survivor, and uncertainty about the future for the stroke survivor and caregiver—were identified. Multiple definitions of caregiver burden have been used. In the early poststroke period, burden appears closely interconnected with other factors, some of which may be modifiable.

Suggested Citation

  • Eeeseung Byun & Lois K. Evans, 2015. "Concept Analysis of Burden in Caregivers of Stroke Survivors During the Early Poststroke Period," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 24(5), pages 468-486, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:24:y:2015:i:5:p:468-486
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773814537060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773814537060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773814537060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:24:y:2015:i:5:p:468-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.