IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v23y2014i3p336-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ Interpretation of Patient Status Descriptions on the Braden Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Jeungok Choi
  • Jeeyae Choi
  • Hyeoneui Kim

Abstract

The risk of pressure ulcers is widely assessed using the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk, which describes patient characteristics for various severity levels. However, many of these characteristics are described in vague terms that nurses may interpret inconsistently, potentially threatening scale reliability. To examine the consistency of nurses’ interpretations of five vaguely described patient characteristics on the Braden Scale we surveyed a convenience sample of 102 nurses and compared their interpretations with those of two nurse experts. The results show large variations in nurses’ interpretations. Although the highest frequency of nurses’ responses to the majority of descriptions was consistent with the experts’ interpretation, the large variation in responses may seriously threaten consistent and accurate assessment of pressure-ulcer risk with the Braden Scale. Our findings suggest that training programs provide operational definitions of these vague patient descriptions, so the Braden Scale can be used consistently in patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeungok Choi & Jeeyae Choi & Hyeoneui Kim, 2014. "Nurses’ Interpretation of Patient Status Descriptions on the Braden Scale," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(3), pages 336-346, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:23:y:2014:i:3:p:336-346
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773813486477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773813486477
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773813486477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:23:y:2014:i:3:p:336-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.