IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v20y2011i3p245-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family-Provider Alliance Program in Intensive Care Units

Author

Listed:
  • Son Chae Kim

    (Point Loma Nazarene University, San Diego, CA, sonkim@pointloma.edu)

  • Amy D. Yates

    (University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA)

  • Patricia Graham

    (University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA)

  • Caroline E. Brown

    (University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA)

Abstract

This nonrandomized controlled study evaluated the effects of Family—Provider Alliance Program on nurses’ perception of therapeutic alliance, job satisfaction, and quality of care. A total of 275 nurses were included in the study: 206 nurses in the ICUs participated in the Program and 69 in the control group did not. Mean postinterventional Kim Alliance Scale-Provider score was improved not only in the experimental group (+0.87; p = .01), but also in the control group (+1.37; p = .016). However, Empowerment subscale mean score was improved in the experimental group alone (+0.34; p = .006). Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that family—nurse therapeutic alliance explained 7.2% and 11.4% of the variance in nurses’ job satisfaction and perceived quality of care, respectively. The Program was marginally effective in improving nurses’ perception of family empowerment. The quality of family—nurse therapeutic alliance predicted small to moderate fractions of the variance in nurses’ job satisfaction and perceived quality of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Son Chae Kim & Amy D. Yates & Patricia Graham & Caroline E. Brown, 2011. "Family-Provider Alliance Program in Intensive Care Units," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 245-262, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:245-262
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773811403471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773811403471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773811403471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:245-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.