IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v1y1992i3p292-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Postoperative Pain Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline D. Fortin

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Donna Schwartz-Barcott

    (University of Rhode Island)

  • Susan Rossi

    (University of Rhode Island)

Abstract

In surgical nursing practice, postoperative pain is of particular concern because of its documented effect on recovery and behaviors associated with recovery. Yet, little is known about the nature of this pain, other than its intensity. In this study, a description of the nature of the postoperative pain experience was generated from analysis of patient responses to the McGill Pain Questionnaire in four nursing intervention studies. The combined sample included 246 adult cholecystectomy patients. Patient descriptions of pain on the third postoperative day suggest a circumscribed sensory experience of moderate intensity. Sensory descriptors selected reflect two levels of noxious stimulation, one at the deeper somatic level (e.g., throbbing, stabbing, cramping, pulling, and burning) and one at a more superficial level (e.g., pricking, sharp, pinching, itching, sore, and tender). Descriptors of deeper pain tended to reflect greater intensity. The overall experience was characterized by 16 descriptors, selected by more than 30% of the sample and reflecting sensory, affective, and evaluative dimensions of the pain experience. Comparison of the findings from this combined sample drawn from hospitals in the northeastern United States were remarkably similar to those reported by Taenzer in Canada. The descriptors selected support, extend, and validate the kind of "sensation information" needed in preoperative instruction used in nursing practice and for abdominal surgery and can be useful in the assessment and management of postoperative pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline D. Fortin & Donna Schwartz-Barcott & Susan Rossi, 1992. "The Postoperative Pain Experience," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 1(3), pages 292-304, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:1:y:1992:i:3:p:292-304
    DOI: 10.1177/105477389200100308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389200100308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/105477389200100308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:1:y:1992:i:3:p:292-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.