IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v1y1992i1p80-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Psychiatric Nurses Say about Constant Care

Author

Listed:
  • Olive Yonge

    (University of Alberta)

  • L. L. Stewin

    (University of Alberta)

Abstract

As part of a qualitative research project on constant care, 8 psychiatric nurses described their perceptions of the constant care experience and its purposes and values. One of the major domains that emerged from the interviews was "nursing"; it consisted of nine themes, some of which indicated that constant care alters the passage, meaning, and use of time, is a dynamic rather than a static relationship, and enhances a nurse's sense of powerfulness. The findings showed that constant care is a dynamic, and to some, distorting, experience. It demands extra work from the nurses, yet constrains them from doing counseling or other higher-order interventions. Having more nursing experience was seen as an advantage in preparing for constant care, controlling angry feelings, and discriminating for potentially dangerous situations. Also, due to the interactive nature of constant care, a nurse could not merely guard a patient because the nurse is also on constant care. These findings have implications for making patient assignments, teaching novice nurses how to do constant care, of firming current practice even though it is against hospital policies, and illustrating how nurses can be aware of and resourceful when constant care is stressful.

Suggested Citation

  • Olive Yonge & L. L. Stewin, 1992. "What Psychiatric Nurses Say about Constant Care," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 1(1), pages 80-90, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:1:y:1992:i:1:p:80-90
    DOI: 10.1177/105477389200100109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389200100109
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/105477389200100109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:1:y:1992:i:1:p:80-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.