IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v19y2010i3p289-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Work Environment on Telephone Advice Nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Anita C. Reinhardt

    (New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA, acrein@nmsu.edu)

Abstract

Telephone advice nursing (TAN) is part of a current effort to improve patient access while reducing cost and encouraging self-care. However, the environment in which TAN occurs can significantly affect both nurse and patient outcomes. This research builds on findings from a large health maintenance organization study by Valanis et al. in which questionnaires and call descriptions were used to correlate TAN nurse and caller/patient perceptions of calls at three regional sites. The survey tools were used to identify nurse perceptions of their work environments (WEs) as well as caller perceptions of using the advice service. The sample included 88 nurse questionnaires and 865 caller questionnaires. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed significant site perception differences in the WE of stress, communication, and autonomy, whereas no significant differences were noted in collegial relationships and organizational support. Each site was also determined to be a unique predictor of patient perceptions of satisfaction with the advice. Findings indicate nursing professionals act as a filter to mask stressful WE effects experienced by nurses and ensure patient outcomes thereby supporting patient satisfaction with the service.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita C. Reinhardt, 2010. "The Impact of Work Environment on Telephone Advice Nursing," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 19(3), pages 289-310, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:289-310
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773810371707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773810371707
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773810371707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:289-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.