IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v19y2010i1p21-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse Decision Making in the Prearrest Period

Author

Listed:
  • Priscilla K. Gazarian

    (University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, priscilla.gazarian@gmail.com)

  • Elizabeth A. Henneman

    (University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA)

  • Genevieve E. Chandler

    (University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA)

Abstract

There is a significant body of research demonstrating that many hospitalized patients exhibit signs of clinical deterioration prior to experiencing a cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA).This qualitative study used the critical decision method to describe the cues and factors employed by nurses to identify and interrupt a potentially preventable CPA. The cues that nurses used in identifying a patient at risk for CPA were altered level of consciousness and other selected triggers from the Early Warning Scoring System (EWSS) combined with knowledge of the patient and the contextual features of the decision situation. Nurse characteristics that assisted in interrupting an adverse event included previous experiences in prearrest situations, and the ability to function as part of a team. Organizational characteristics that supported the nurse to interrupt included the availability of nurse-initiated monitoring equipment, experience and flexibility of staff, working with a collaborative team, and access to knowledge resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Priscilla K. Gazarian & Elizabeth A. Henneman & Genevieve E. Chandler, 2010. "Nurse Decision Making in the Prearrest Period," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 19(1), pages 21-37, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:21-37
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773809353161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773809353161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773809353161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:21-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.