IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v16y2007i4p350-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding in Nursing Homes

Author

Listed:
  • Ailsa M. Brotherton

    (University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)

  • Bernie Carter

    (University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of relatives of nursing home residents receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Qualitative methodology using semistructured interviews explores the experiences and perceptions of eight relatives. Data are analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes are constructed from the data: dependence and resulting disempowerment, having minimal or no involvement in the decision-making process for PEG placement, betrayal, and the losses associated with the social aspects of eating. There is a need for professional education about the psychosocial implications of feeding and an increased level of support for relatives to assist them to develop coping strategies. This will require an expansion of current professional roles to include assessment of individual need, setting of appropriate goals, and the coordination of the provision of multiagency services, likely to include counseling and social support. Further research is required in this field to inform service developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ailsa M. Brotherton & Bernie Carter, 2007. "Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding in Nursing Homes," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 16(4), pages 350-369, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:350-369
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773807306551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773807306551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773807306551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:350-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.