IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v12y2003i1p85-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acute Dyspnea as Perceived by Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Marjorie M. V. Heinzer
  • Catherine Bish
  • Ruth Detwiler

Abstract

Like pain, dyspnea, or difficulty in breathing, is a strong subjective experience of physiological distress. Using a model developed by DeVito, this study focused on the emotional aspects of the acute experience of dyspnea in patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on a medical unit and explored nursing activities that eased the intensity of the symptoms. The study was descriptive in design and used a semistructured interview format with four open-ended questions and a numerical self-assessment of dyspnea using the Modified 0-10 Borg Scale (MBS). The sample included 41 hospitalized patients with COPD between the ages of 43 and 89 years who had experienced episodes of acute dyspnea both prior to and during their current inpatient stays. This article provides descriptions of the experience of dyspnea, identifies themes from the participants' responses, notes the patients' perceptions of the efficacy of nursing actions, and extends the use of the MBS to an inpatient population.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjorie M. V. Heinzer & Catherine Bish & Ruth Detwiler, 2003. "Acute Dyspnea as Perceived by Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 12(1), pages 85-101, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:85-101
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773803238742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773803238742
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773803238742?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:85-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.