IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v62y2026i3p358-369.html

China’s Educational Paradox: Does an Exam-centric System Allow Space for Creativity?

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. weidavid@ualberta.ca)

Abstract

The Chinese education system has long been characterised as one that produces disciplined and hard-working students, but at the expense of innovation and creativity. This perception has often been cited as a partial explanation for why China lagged behind its Western counterparts in modern industrialisation from the early nineteenth century onwards. However, the remarkable surge of technological innovation in China over the past two decades in the twenty-first century seems to challenge this long-held view, suggesting that the system may not be as detrimental to fostering creativity and innovation as once believed. To address this educational paradox, this article critically examines three major critiques of the perceived inability of Chinese education to foster creativity: (a) the traditional pedagogical culture is said to downplay creative thinking; (b) the highly competitive, exam-oriented system tends to prioritise knowledge accumulation over innovation; (c) The non-electoral political environment encourages conformity in thought. By unpacking these critiques, the article argues for the importance of adopting a more nuanced and dialectical understanding of Chinese education.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu, 2026. "China’s Educational Paradox: Does an Exam-centric System Allow Space for Creativity?," China Report, , vol. 62(3), pages 358-369, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:62:y:2026:i:3:p:358-369
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455261447217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455261447217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455261447217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:62:y:2026:i:3:p:358-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.