IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v62y2026i1p53-74.html

Identity, Self-interest or Learning? What Influences the De Facto Generation’s China-friendly Attitudes?

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-chou Wang

    (Department of Public Policy and Management, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. jjw@isu.edu.tw)

Abstract

If Taiwan is to ensure peace in the Taiwan Strait, the best choice for the island is to align with the USA while sending goodwill messages to China. This study examines Taiwan’s de facto generation’s friendliness to China and the influencing factors. A scale developed on identity theory to measure the generation’s China-friendly attitude returned an average score of 2.87 out of 4. A mixed-method approach was used: Regression analysis was employed to verify the hypotheses; meanwhile, interview data were used to validate the link between the theoretical reasoning and social realities. The regression model based on social identity, rational choice and political socialisation theories explained 37.96% of the variation in attitude. The findings show that both the evaluation of self-interest and belief in equality trump advocacy for Taiwan’s independence in explaining this generation’s China-friendly attitude, contrary to their stereotype of being anti-China. This study’s findings shed light on which China-friendly policies can be pursued by the Taiwanese government while considering the attitude of Taiwan’s youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-chou Wang, 2026. "Identity, Self-interest or Learning? What Influences the De Facto Generation’s China-friendly Attitudes?," China Report, , vol. 62(1), pages 53-74, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:62:y:2026:i:1:p:53-74
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455251392172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455251392172
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455251392172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:62:y:2026:i:1:p:53-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.