IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v58y2022i4p390-409.html

New Media Activism and Politics of Ecology in the People’s Republic of China

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Joseph

    (School of Liberal Arts and Applied Sciences, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science (HITS), Chennai, India.)

  • Joe Thomas Karackattu

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT-M), Chennai, India. joe@iitm.ac.in)

Abstract

The environmental sector is an interesting realm in Chinese politics to observe factors such as the contributions of new media activism in bottom-up communication and decision-making processes, especially during the 40 years of reform and opening up. Top-down efforts to curb environmental issues are primarily to address increasing pubic discomfort due to pollution and related problems. However, environmental movements are increasingly visible in China despite their application of stability maintenance mechanisms such as Environmental Police. It is therefore noteworthy to deeply analyse the factors that contribute to the increasing scale of movements in the country. This study examines the role of new media activism (occurring due to the public’s interactions through WeChat, Weibo, QQ, etc.) in shaping the trajectory of environmental movements in China. How are these avenues supporting alternative communication channels outside the mainstream policy making apparatus? Is the government willing to incorporate the interests developed in these channels to policymaking realms? How these behavioural changes are influencing the state–society relations in contemporary China in the context of increasing environmental concerns. The study employs agency-structure framework to analyse the interactions between new media activism and the single party ruling political structure with the support fieldwork data from China. The study examines policy documents, official declarations of the communist party, public attitude towards new media activism, and so on, in order to present a comprehensive understanding on the politics of ecology in the PRC.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Joseph & Joe Thomas Karackattu, 2022. "New Media Activism and Politics of Ecology in the People’s Republic of China," China Report, , vol. 58(4), pages 390-409, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:58:y:2022:i:4:p:390-409
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455221080320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455221080320
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455221080320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongdong Shen & Benjamin Steuer, 2017. "Conflict or cooperation: the patterns of interaction between state and non-state actors in China’s environmental governance," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 349-359, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rong Wu & Shuang Ling, 2025. "The effect of the accountability system in promoting environmental conflict governance: an evolutionary game analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 7727-7756, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:58:y:2022:i:4:p:390-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.