IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v58y2022i1p60-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vanguard to Periphery: The CPC’s Changing Narrative on the Labour Question

Author

Listed:
  • Anand Parappadi Krishnan

    (Institute of Chinese Studies, Delhi, India. anand.p.krishnan@gmail.com)

Abstract

With the ideological undergirding of Marxism–Leninism, the Communist Party of China (CPC) has claimed representation of peasants and workers in its vanguard role in actualising the socialist revolution. However, as China has developed economically over the past four decades, there has been an erosion in the status of workers and peasants as legitimate stakeholders in governance and ruling practices. This article attempts to map how labour, once a critical component of the CPC’s political–ideological invocation, has become peripheral as China transitioned to a market economy with an emphasis on economic rationale for growth and reforms. It examines the changing contours of the CPC’s discourse and practice over the past 100 years on the labour question, sandwiched as it is between the need for continued economic growth as a legitimating tool and the continued reiteration of being representative of the working class.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand Parappadi Krishnan, 2022. "Vanguard to Periphery: The CPC’s Changing Narrative on the Labour Question," China Report, , vol. 58(1), pages 60-74, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:58:y:2022:i:1:p:60-74
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455221074247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455221074247
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455221074247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:58:y:2022:i:1:p:60-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.