IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v49y2013i1p89-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toeing the Line, Drawing the Line: China and Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Author

Listed:
  • Bernt Berger
  • Phillip Schell

Abstract

Over the past decade, China’s relationship with Iran has been half-hearted. What has publicly been regarded as a close bilateral entente is in fact based on Tehran’s lack of better options and China’s clear ambition that a non-nuclear Iran should not be economically destabilised. The withdrawal of Chinese companies from technology transfers to Iran and the improvement of China’s export controls have led to frustration on the Iranian side and set bounds to bilateral relations for the long term. Today, China tries to convey its disagreement with Iran’s nuclear weapons program. At the same time, China has tried to separate the nuclear issue from civilian perspectives and opposed sanctions that might lastingly cripple Iran’s economy. The reasons can be found in China’s strategic regional considerations and interests in stability both inside and outside Iran. Thus, China has become a diplomatic broker whose credentials only suffer by the shortcomings of its own export control regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernt Berger & Phillip Schell, 2013. "Toeing the Line, Drawing the Line: China and Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions," China Report, , vol. 49(1), pages 89-101, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:89-101
    DOI: 10.1177/0009445513479248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445513479248
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0009445513479248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:89-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.