IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v43y2007i2p213-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for Trilateral Cooperation in the Agricultural Sphere

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Portyakov

    (Vladimir Portyakov is in Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 32, Nakhimovsky Avenue, Moscow 117218. E-mail: portyakov@ifes-ras.ru)

Abstract

An examination of the state of Russia's agrarian sector reveals that at present China and India are not among its leading partners in agricultural and food products trade. The Sino-Indian trade in agrarian products is also insignificant. Factors inhibiting such trade were competition from other countries selling the same type of product; high prices of imported agrarian products; restrictions on the import of such products based on sanitary requirements and quality standards; differences in the perceptions of the three countries regarding their own food security; and different traditions and structures of nutrition in the three countries. If such inhibitions are overcome trade could constitute an important form of cooperation between the three countries in the agrarian sector. Russia and China are also cooperating through the use of Chinese labour for farming on rented land, while Russia and India are interested in sharing of experience of applying microbiology technology for production of biological fertiliser. Coordination between the three countries with regard to the agrarian agenda of the WTO and in the markets of other countries are also possibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Portyakov, 2007. "Potential for Trilateral Cooperation in the Agricultural Sphere," China Report, , vol. 43(2), pages 213-218, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:43:y:2007:i:2:p:213-218
    DOI: 10.1177/000944550704300210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000944550704300210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000944550704300210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:43:y:2007:i:2:p:213-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.