Author
Abstract
Diplomacy is now under rapid evolution. This means ever-widening international contacts by official agencies other than the foreign ministry, the sub-state agencies, and non-state actors; the impact of information and communication revolution; and gradual ‘democratisation’, via institutional plurality, emerging public-private partnerships and a stronger role of home publics. Most foreign ministries now pursue reform as a continuous activity. China is one such example. The evolution in China's diplomatic system since 1949 demonstrates how professional expertise challenges ideological commitment, though both criteria remain relevant. On strategic policy issues, this system is highly efficient, and coordinated through the ‘leading small group’ mechanism operating under the Party Politburo. Yet inter-ministry harmonisation in routine issues is often blocked, thanks to the entrenched old vertical hierarchies. This limits in and out placements of officials, except within set parameters. Political diplomacy is today innovative and supple in its execution. The practice of economic diplomacy remains low key, with embassies less engaged in ‘marketing’ projects, compared with Western counterparts. Cultural diplomacy is shifting to high gear, and will be a major theme at the 2008 Olympics. Domestic public diplomacy, outreach to home publics has become a top priority. The foreign ministry makes effective use of think tanks and retired envoys to provide inputs into the policy process, and is far ahead of India in the multiple policy options that this plural process generates, though policy formulation remains tightly guarded and secretive. China's diplomatic service has unique features— a single class hierarchy; ruthless fast-track implementation that propels the talented to high office at early age; a major problem of attrition, with many quitting in the first few years; an excellent system of language and area specialisation; continuous gender inequality. We may count on continuing refinement and improvement of the Chinese diplomatic process.
Suggested Citation
Kishan Rana, 2005.
"The Structure and Operation of China's Diplomatic System,"
China Report, , vol. 41(3), pages 215-236, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:41:y:2005:i:3:p:215-236
DOI: 10.1177/000944550504100301
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:41:y:2005:i:3:p:215-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.