IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v13y2025i2p191-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Influence of Kinabalu Geopark Development on Community Well-being from the Perspective of Policymakers: A Preliminary Study

Author

Listed:
  • Oscar Dousin
  • Rostika Petrus Boroh
  • Sarma Binti Aralas

Abstract

Kinabalu Geopark is located in Sabah, Malaysia, Borneo, and it will be the second Geopark landmark in Malaysia. The study aimed to explore the implications of the development of Kinabalu Geopark to community well-being. The central research question is: “How does Kinabalu Geopark development enhance and promote community well-being from the perspectives of policymakers?†This study employs a qualitative research approach guided by an interpretivist paradigm by interviewing 15 policymakers. Findings indicated three key themes of community well-being, (i) economic well-being, (ii) social well-being, and (iii) criticality of engagement initiatives. Economic well-being refers to how the development of Kinabalu Geopark would help to strengthen the local economy by providing more employment and business opportunities. Social well-being relates to how communities will benefit from the social stability and strong relationships formed by government sectors, local community leaders, and society. Then, engagement initiative by the policymakers is crucial to ensure the projects’ success, community leadership, and community-wide engagement activities are essential. As a result of efforts to maintain geological characteristics and natural resources, geopark development may not only give prospects for local economic and social growth, but it may also expand educational programs, research, and development for scientific and tourism objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Oscar Dousin & Rostika Petrus Boroh & Sarma Binti Aralas, 2025. "Exploring the Influence of Kinabalu Geopark Development on Community Well-being from the Perspective of Policymakers: A Preliminary Study," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 13(2), pages 191-205, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:191-205
    DOI: 10.1177/22785337221113150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22785337221113150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22785337221113150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:191-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.