IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v10y2022i2p213-233.html

Optimization of Capital Distribution and Composition of a Shipping Company Fleet Through Evolutionary Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Alkis Thrassou
  • Demetris Vrontis
  • Georgios Georgopoulos
  • Petros Lois
  • Spyros Repousis

Abstract

The research examines the optimization of fleet management of a shipping company through control algorithms, as finding an algorithm that will reduce a marine company’s exposure to risk by diversifying its fleet composition is one way to make it dominant. The study focused on three companies that, in 2014, invested US$$1 billion in a fleet of tankers, using three different techniques to optimize their fleet composition: equal number of ships of all types, the established risk minimization model and the proposed Risky Asset Pricing maximization model. Seven years of data was used for the synthesis and 4 years of data was used for the evaluation. The research findings show that classic portfolio management through risk minimization is ineffective, as it appears to reduce performance below what is a random or evenly distributed fleet. Comparing the three methods, the superiority of the Risky Asset Pricing model is clear. This algorithm looks for solutions where the demand for ships is low but has enormous fluctuation potential and seeks to identify ships that are at high risk with great potential for price increases to maximize investor returns. The value of the research lies in the identification of methods to optimize capital distribution and composition of a shipping company fleet, which presents valuable insights for the benefit of scholars and maritime companies. Moreover, and contrary to extant works that focus on Markowitz’s theory, this article instead describes how evolutionary algorithms can be used to optimize fleet management.

Suggested Citation

  • Alkis Thrassou & Demetris Vrontis & Georgios Georgopoulos & Petros Lois & Spyros Repousis, 2022. "Optimization of Capital Distribution and Composition of a Shipping Company Fleet Through Evolutionary Algorithms," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 10(2), pages 213-233, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:213-233
    DOI: 10.1177/22785337211011978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22785337211011978
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22785337211011978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Wibisono & Phongchai Jittamai, 2017. "Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a ship routing problem in maritime logistics collaboration," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(2), pages 225-252.
    2. Lin, Chang-Chun & Liu, Yi-Ting, 2008. "Genetic algorithms for portfolio selection problems with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 393-404, February.
    3. Panayotis G Zacharioudakis & Stylianos Iordanis & Dimitrios V Lyridis & Harilaos N Psaraftis, 2011. "Liner shipping cycle cost modelling, fleet deployment optimization and what-if analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(3), pages 278-297, September.
    4. Saurabh Pratap & Manoj Kumar B & Divyanshu Saxena & M.K. Tiwari, 2016. "Integrated scheduling of rake and stockyard management with ship berthing: a block based evolutionary algorithm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 4182-4204, July.
    5. Branke, J. & Scheckenbach, B. & Stein, M. & Deb, K. & Schmeck, H., 2009. "Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 684-693, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ameet Kumar Banerjee & H. K. Pradhan & Ahmet Sensoy & Frank Fabozzi & Biplab Mahapatra, 2024. "Robust portfolio optimization with fuzzy TODIM, genetic algorithm and multi-criteria constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(1), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Hirschberger, Markus & Qi, Yue & Steuer, Ralph E., 2010. "Large-scale MV efficient frontier computation via a procedure of parametric quadratic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 581-588, August.
    3. Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos & Georgios Mamanis, 2011. "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for complex portfolio optimization problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 259-279, August.
    4. Steuer, Ralph E. & Qi, Yue & Wimmer, Maximilian, 2024. "Computing cardinality constrained portfolio selection efficient frontiers via closest correlation matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 628-636.
    5. Liu, Weilong & Zhang, Yong & Liu, Kailong & Quinn, Barry & Yang, Xingyu & Peng, Qiao, 2023. "Evolutionary multi-objective optimisation for large-scale portfolio selection with both random and uncertain returns," QBS Working Paper Series 2023/02, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Business School.
    6. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2015. "A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 933-941.
    7. Bilel JARRAYA, 2013. "Asset Allocation And Portfolio Optimization Problems With Metaheuristics: A Literature Survey," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(4), pages 38-56, December.
    8. Bo Zhang & Jin Peng & Shengguo Li, 2015. "Uncertain programming models for portfolio selection with uncertain returns," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 2510-2519, October.
    9. Nonthachote Chatsanga & Andrew J. Parkes, 2016. "International Portfolio Optimisation with Integrated Currency Overlay Costs and Constraints," Papers 1611.01463, arXiv.org.
    10. Vladimir Rankovic & Mikica Drenovak & Branko Uroševic & Ranko Jelic, 2016. "Mean Univariate-GARCH VaR Portfolio Optimization: Actual Portfolio Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 5731, CESifo.
    11. Drenovak, Mikica & Ranković, Vladimir & Urošević, Branko & Jelic, Ranko, 2022. "Mean-Maximum Drawdown Optimization of Buy-and-Hold Portfolios Using a Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    12. Jian Xiong & Rui Wang & Jiang Jiang, 2019. "Weapon Selection and Planning Problems Using MOEA/D with Distance-Based Divided Neighborhoods," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, November.
    13. Lam, Chiou-Peng & Masek, Martin & Kelly, Luke & Papasimeon, Michael & Benke, Lyndon, 2019. "A simheuristic approach for evolving agent behaviour in the exploration for novel combat tactics," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    14. Mahdi Massahi & Masoud Mahootchi & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh, 2020. "Development of an efficient cluster-based portfolio optimization model under realistic market conditions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2423-2442, November.
    15. Kian-Guan Lim & Michelle Lim, 2020. "Financial performance of shipping firms that increase LNG carriers and the support of eco-innovation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Buckley, Winston & Long, Hongwei & Marshall, Mario, 2016. "Numerical approximations of optimal portfolios in mispriced asymmetric Lévy markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 676-686.
    17. Kraft, Holger & Steffensen, Mogens, 2012. "A dynamic programming approach to constrained portfolios," CFS Working Paper Series 2012/07, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    18. Gianni Filograsso & Giacomo Tollo, 2023. "Adaptive evolutionary algorithms for portfolio selection problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-38, December.
    19. Rosadi, Dedi & Setiawan, Ezra Putranda & Templ, Matthias & Filzmoser, Peter, 2020. "Robust covariance estimators for mean-variance portfolio optimization with transaction lots," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    20. Christian Va Karsten & Stefan Ropke & David Pisinger, 2018. "Simultaneous Optimization of Container Ship Sailing Speed and Container Routing with Transit Time Restrictions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 769-787, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:213-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.