IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v10y2022i1p164-184.html

Modelling Teachers Accountability in the Higher Educational Institutions Using Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shefali Srivastava
  • Gyan Prakash
  • Ritika Gauba

Abstract

This article aims to identify teachers’ accountability in the context of higher educational institutions (HEIs). Most of the literature has used student-oriented outcomes as basic building blocks of accountability. This article contributes to the literature by gauging teachers’ perceptions in conceptualising accountability in the HEIs. Indicators of accountability have been identified from the literature. Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method has been used to explore the nature of interrelationships among these indicators. Results reveal that accountability indicators have varying impact and some of these indicators have cause and effect type of relationship among them. The article underscores the role of performance-based accountability system (PBAS) which will help in assessing and evaluating teachers in the HEIs. It is argued that accountability strengthens the autopoietic nature of the HEIs and enables underlying knowledge generation and dissemination processes. Using accountability indicators, teachers can self-assess their performance and adapt to evolving needs of students, businesses, and societal stakeholders. The relationships among accountability indicators can be used by policymakers to steer the HEIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shefali Srivastava & Gyan Prakash & Ritika Gauba, 2022. "Modelling Teachers Accountability in the Higher Educational Institutions Using Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Approach," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 10(1), pages 164-184, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:164-184
    DOI: 10.1177/2278533720942039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2278533720942039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2278533720942039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trudy W. Banta, 2005. "Quality and Accountability in Higher Education: Improving Policy, Enhancing Performance," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(1), pages 112-114, January.
    2. Daniel M. Koretz, 2002. "Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators' Productivity," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 37(4), pages 752-777.
    3. Nicholas W. Hillman & David A. Tandberg & Jacob P. K. Gross, 2014. "Performance Funding in Higher Education: Do Financial Incentives Impact College Completions?," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(6), pages 826-857, November.
    4. Mmantsetsa Toka Marope, 2005. "Namibia Human Capital and Knowledge Development for Economic Growth with Equity," World Bank Publications - Reports 36219, The World Bank Group.
    5. Sadri Tahar & Roman Boutellier, 2013. "Resource Allocation in Higher Education in The Context of New Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 687-711, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy Y. Li, 2017. "Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(7), pages 746-771, November.
    2. Jeffrey T. Denning & Eric R. Eide & Kevin J. Mumford & Richard W. Patterson & Merrill Warnick, 2022. "Why Have College Completion Rates Increased?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Atuhurra, Julius F., 2016. "Does community involvement affect teacher effort? Assessing learning impacts of Free Primary Education in Kenya," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 234-246.
    4. Derek Neal, 2011. "The Design of Performance Pay in Education," NBER Working Papers 16710, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Theodore M. Crone, 2004. "What test scores can and cannot tell us about the quality of our schools," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q3, pages 5-21.
    6. Michael Kuhn & Luigi Siciliani, 2009. "Performance Indicators for Quality with Costly Falsification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 1137-1154, December.
    7. Wadim Strielkowski & Vyacheslav Volchik & Artyom Maskaev & Pavel Savko, 2020. "Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Jason Ward & Ben Ost, 2021. "The Effect of Large-scale Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 16(1), pages 92-124, Winter.
    9. Dante Contreras & Jorge Rodríguez & Sergio Urzúa, 2019. "The Return to Private Education: Evidence from School-to-Work Transitions," Working Papers wp479, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    10. Deborah Wilson & Bronwyn Croxson & Adele Atkinson, 2004. "“What Gets Measured Gets Done”: Headteachers’ Responses to the English Secondary School," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 04/107, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    11. Dang,Hai-Anh H. & King,Elizabeth M. & Dang,Hai-Anh H. & King,Elizabeth M., 2013. "Incentives and teacher effort : further evidence from a developing country," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6694, The World Bank.
    12. Denisa Gándara & Amanda Rutherford, 2018. "Mitigating Unintended Impacts? The Effects of Premiums for Underserved Populations in Performance-Funding Policies for Higher Education," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(6), pages 681-703, September.
    13. Webber, Douglas A., 2017. "Risk-sharing and student loan policy: Consequences for students and institutions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Joana R. Casanova & Adrián Castro-López & Ana B. Bernardo & Leandro S. Almeida, 2023. "The Dropout of First-Year STEM Students: Is It Worth Looking beyond Academic Achievement?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Thomas J. Kane & Douglas O. Staiger, 2002. "The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 91-114, Fall.
    16. Christopher C. Klein, 2007. "Efficiency versus Effectiveness: Interpreting Education Production Studies," Working Papers 200703, Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Economics and Finance.
    17. Kuhn, Michael & Siciliani, Luigi, 2007. "Performance Indicators for Quality with Adverse Selection, Gaming and Inequality Aversion," CEPR Discussion Papers 6261, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Barrera-Osorio, Felipe & Cilliers, Jacobus & Cloutier, Marie-Hélène & Filmer, Deon, 2022. "Heterogenous teacher effects of two incentive schemes: Evidence from a low-income country," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    19. Gary R. Pike & Kirsten R. Robbins, 2020. "Using Panel Data to Identify the Effects of Institutional Characteristics, Cohort Characteristics, and Institutional Actions on Graduation Rates," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(4), pages 485-509, June.
    20. Tran, Trung & Thanh, Hai Trinh & Van Le, Dao & Phuong, Thao Trinh Thi & Lan, Phuong Nguyen, 2022. "Does government financial support decrease the inefficiency of public universities? A decomposition approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:164-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.