IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v50y2025i2p291-311.html

Climate risk and response: Generating an industry-informed, future-focused, research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Bill Bovingdon

    (Head of Fixed Income, Australian Ethical Investment, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Adjunct Fellow, UNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, Australia)

  • Peter Cheesman

    (Head of Risk Capital Analytics APAC, Aon Singapore, Singapore)

  • David Grant

    (Snr. Deputy Director, UNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW Australia; Professor of Management, School of Management and Governance, UNSW Business School, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, Australia)

  • Penny Joseph

    (Director, Climate Resilience, Ausgrid, Sydney, NSW, Australia)

  • Anthony Michael

    (Director, Blackheath Capital, Blackheath, NSW, Australia)

  • Shannon Moffitt

    (Regulatory Strategy Manager, Ausgrid, Sydney, NSW, Australia)

  • Thomas Mortlock

    (Head of Climate Analytics APAC, Aon, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Adjunct Fellow, Climate Change Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia)

  • Greg Mullins

    (Emergency Leaders for Climate Action (ELCA), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Former Commissioner, Fire and Rescue NSW, Greenacre, NSW, Australia)

  • Ben R Newell

    (Director, UNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, Australia; Professor of Behavioural Science, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, Australia)

  • Marissa Papas

    (Grid Strategy Manager, Ausgrid, Sydney, NSW, Australia)

Abstract

There is a significant capacity for management research to contribute to addressing the multifaceted challenge of climate change. This includes identifying and then addressing climate change–related risks and opportunities which are already on the horizon and likely to be of critical importance in the future, but which are not yet the focus of our attention. To do this effectively, and ensure the resulting research is impactful, will involve adopting an abductive research approach; one where industry practitioners collaborate with academic colleagues to develop the kinds of research questions they would seek to have them research. This article demonstrates the value of such an approach. Academics and practitioners are brought together into a co-authoring team that engages in the problematisation of climate risk and opportunity. Four issues emerge as common and significant themes: uncertainty, information, motivation, and investment. These are used to construct an industry-informed, future-focused research agenda. JEL Classification: M100 General

Suggested Citation

  • Bill Bovingdon & Peter Cheesman & David Grant & Penny Joseph & Anthony Michael & Shannon Moffitt & Thomas Mortlock & Greg Mullins & Ben R Newell & Marissa Papas, 2025. "Climate risk and response: Generating an industry-informed, future-focused, research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 291-311, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:50:y:2025:i:2:p:291-311
    DOI: 10.1177/03128962251326088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03128962251326088
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/03128962251326088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanna Andrea Pinilla‐De La Cruz & Rodrigo Rabetino & Jussi Kantola, 2022. "Unveiling the shades of partnerships for the energy transition and sustainable development: Connecting public–private partnerships and emerging hybrid schemes," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1370-1386, October.
    2. Al-Thaqeb, Saud Asaad & Algharabali, Barrak Ghanim, 2019. "Economic policy uncertainty: A literature review," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    3. Tiberio Daddi & Niccolò Maria Todaro & Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Marco Frey, 2018. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 456-474, May.
    4. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    5. Jury Gualandris & Oana Branzei & Miriam Wilhelm & Sergio Lazzarini & Martina Linnenluecke & Ralph Hamann & Kevin J. Dooley & Michael L. Barnett & Chien‐Ming Chen, 2024. "Unchaining supply chains: Transformative leaps toward regenerating social–ecological systems," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(1), pages 53-67, January.
    6. Catherine Collins, 2025. "A call for ‘Engaged Problematisation’ papers: A pathway to inspire, explore and support industry–academic collaborations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(1), pages 3-7, February.
    7. Daniel Ellsberg, 1961. "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 75(4), pages 643-669.
    8. Monika Winn & Manfred Kirchgeorg & Andrew Griffiths & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Elmar Günther, 2011. "Impacts from climate change on organizations: a conceptual foundation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 157-173, March.
    9. Newell, Richard G. & Pizer, William A., 2004. "Uncertain discount rates in climate policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 519-529, March.
    10. Bhutta, Umair Saeed & Tariq, Adeel & Farrukh, Muhammad & Raza, Ali & Iqbal, Muhammad Khalid, 2022. "Green bonds for sustainable development: Review of literature on development and impact of green bonds," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Schubert, Christian, 2017. "Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura M. Canevari‐Luzardo & Frans Berkhout & Mark Pelling, 2020. "A relational view of climate adaptation in the private sector: How do value chain interactions shape business perceptions of climate risk and adaptive behaviours?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 432-444, February.
    2. Imad Jabbouri & Omar Farooq & Rachid Jabbouri, 2024. "Economic policy uncertainty nexus with the value relevance of advertising: Evidence from an emerging market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2342-2359, April.
    3. Luca Congiu & Ivan Moscati, 2022. "A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 188-213, February.
    4. Treepongkaruna, Sirimon & Jiraporn, Pornsit & Kyaw, Khine, 2025. "EPU diversity, corporate investments, and corporate governance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    5. Niccolò Maria Todaro & Francesco Testa & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2021. "The influence of managers' awareness of climate change, perceived climate risk exposure and risk tolerance on the adoption of corporate responses to climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1232-1248, February.
    6. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    7. Morone, Andrea & Caferra, Rocco, 2024. "The Ambiguity Box: A new tool to generate ambiguity in the lab," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Anne Corcos & François Pannequin & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, 2012. "Aversions to Trust," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 78(3), pages 115-134.
    9. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    10. Simona Fabrizi & Steffen Lippert & Addison Pan & Matthew Ryan, 2022. "A theory of unanimous jury voting with an ambiguous likelihood," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 399-425, October.
    11. Indriyana Puspitosari & Hadri Kusuma & Johan Arifin, 2026. "Macroeconomic Determinants of Tax Avoidance and the Moderating Role of Public Governance," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 20-37.
    12. Kiyohiko G. Nishimura & Hiroyuki Ozaki, 2001. "Search under the Knightian Uncertainty," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-112, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    13. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Liu, Xiao-xiao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Aggregating the DEA prospect cross-efficiency with an application to state key laboratories in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Delin Zeng & Jingbo Hu & Taohua Ouyang, 2017. "Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. André Lapied & Thomas Rongiconi, 2013. "Ambiguity as a Source of Temptation: Modeling Unstable Beliefs," Working Papers halshs-00797631, HAL.
    16. Chorvat, Terrence, 2006. "Taxing utility," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Vassili Vergopoulos, 2014. "A Behavioral Definition of States of the World," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    18. Ghirardato, Paolo & Marinacci, Massimo, 2002. "Ambiguity Made Precise: A Comparative Foundation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 251-289, February.
    19. He, Wei & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 2015. "Equilibrium theory under ambiguity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 86-95.
    20. Ferdinand M. Vieider, 2024. "Decisions Under Uncertainty as Bayesian Inference on Choice Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(12), pages 9014-9030, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:50:y:2025:i:2:p:291-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.