IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v30y2005i1p57-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Representations of Negotiation

Author

Listed:
  • Mara Olekalns

    (Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne, 200 Leicester St, Carlton, VIC 3053.)

  • Philip L. Smith

    (Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010.)

Abstract

Using a bilateral negotiation, we examined the relationship between motivational orientation, mental maps and negotiators' outcomes. Cooperative and competitive negotiators bargained with a counterpart who held either the same or a different orientation. Compared to negotiators in mixed dyads, those in same-orientation dyads placed greater emphasis on cooperation, flexibility and trust; and less emphasis on competition. Flexibility was critical to joint gain when at least one negotiator held competitive goals, but detrimental when both negotiators held cooperative goals. Negotiators in same-orientation dyads reported a more positive experience than negotiators in mixed-orientation dyads.

Suggested Citation

  • Mara Olekalns & Philip L. Smith, 2005. "Cognitive Representations of Negotiation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 30(1), pages 57-76, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:30:y:2005:i:1:p:57-76
    DOI: 10.1177/031289620503000104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289620503000104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289620503000104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael J. Hine & Steven A. Murphy & Michael Weber & Gregory Kersten, 2009. "The Role of Emotion and Language in Dyadic E-negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 193-211, May.
    2. Petru Lucian Curşeu & Sandra Schruijer, 2008. "The Effects of Framing on Inter-group Negotiation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 347-362, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:30:y:2005:i:1:p:57-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.