IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v9y2022i2p207-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into North Korea’s ‘Real’ Nuclear Strategy: A Comparison with Pakistan’s Case

Author

Listed:
  • Hwee-rhak Park

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to ascertain North Korea’s ‘real’ nuclear strategy. This article uses the ‘Strategy = Ends + Ways + Means’ construct for the ascertainment, and it makes comparisons to Pakistan’s nuclear strategy. This article found that North Korea’s goal of its nuclear armament was as ideological and aggressive as Pakistan’s, and that its nuclear strategy is closer to the ‘minimal deterrence strategy’ than Pakistan’s. North Korea seems more desperate than Pakistan because of its dire economic situation and the uncertain future of the Kim family dynasty. It could, therefore, try to achieve its goal, the reunification of South Korea, as soon as it has sufficient capabilities for the strategy. The United States and South Korea should be prepared for the worst-case scenario, which is North Korea’s reunification war against South Korea under the threat of nuclear attack on the US mainland and South Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Hwee-rhak Park, 2022. "An Investigation into North Korea’s ‘Real’ Nuclear Strategy: A Comparison with Pakistan’s Case," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 9(2), pages 207-230, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:9:y:2022:i:2:p:207-230
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970221098467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970221098467
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970221098467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:9:y:2022:i:2:p:207-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.