IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v4y2017i2p196-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feminist Perspectives on Post-riot Judicial Inquiry Commissions in India

Author

Listed:
  • B. Rajeshwari

Abstract

This article argues that though communal riots bring different experiences for men and women, yet this reality does not seem to be recognized by post-riot justice mechanisms. Justice post-riots is viewed as a ‘blanket’ term for all the victims irrespective of their gender. In so doing, women’s everyday experiences seem to get pushed under the carpet. Drawing from feminist critique of the legalistic approach to justice, this article problematizes the understanding that there is only one singular, official version of truth in post-riot situations. The article critically examines post-riot judicial commissions that were constituted to inquire into the Mumbai (1992–1993) and Gujarat (2002) riots from a feminist perspective. I argue that the judicial inquiry commissions in their current format are underequipped to deal with gender concerns that emerge after communal riots. And that there is a need for feminist security studies to venture into critically analyzing judicial inquiry commissions.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Rajeshwari, 2017. "Feminist Perspectives on Post-riot Judicial Inquiry Commissions in India," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 4(2), pages 196-218, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:196-218
    DOI: 10.1177/2347797017710747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2347797017710747
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2347797017710747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:196-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.