IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v1y2014i1p41-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Strange and Bittersweet Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjoy Banerjee
  • Gitika Commuri

Abstract

The United States (US) and Pakistan developed a relationship during the Musharraf era of simultaneous cooperation and coercion against each other. Pakistan helped both the US and the Taliban in their war in Afghanistan. The US aided and reimbursed Pakistan, but also violated its sovereignty on a sustained basis. Realism, Liberalism and prominent varieties of Constructivism do not explain this interaction. The explanation offered here is that each state had certain persistent concepts it applied repeatedly as new situations arose. The concepts are drawn empirically from the policy discourses of the two states after the Musharraf coup, the 9/11 attacks, and during the middle 2000s when Pakistan’s focus on Kashmir diminished but Taliban attacks in Afghanistan intensified. These concepts highlighted some aspects of these situations and occluded others. These descriptions of situations using these concepts formed episodes in situational narratives. The situational narratives do explain the observed interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjoy Banerjee & Gitika Commuri, 2014. "A Strange and Bittersweet Relationship," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 1(1), pages 41-61, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:41-61
    DOI: 10.1177/2347797013518404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2347797013518404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2347797013518404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:1:y:2014:i:1:p:41-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.