IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v13y2026i3p319-341.html

Limited Deterrence: The Emerging (Preferred) Chinese Deterrence Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Nate Ostdiek
  • Edward Torres
  • John Vonnes
  • Michelle Black-Dirks

Abstract

This article explores how Chinese culture influences the Communist Party of China (CPC) leaders’ decision-making and policy setting to predict future CPC decisions and better control escalation. We investigate the question, ‘Which Chinese cultural values influence the CPC’s understanding and application of deterrence strategies to meet their cultural objectives?’ We argue that cultural influences principally explain CPC nuclear build-up and, by extension, the policy shift from minimum to limited deterrence within the CPC. During this process, we discover that the two most prominent deterrence policies in the consciousness of the CPC leadership are minimum and limited deterrence and that the CPC nuclear arsenal is expanding, which may reflect a shift in the CPC policy. To test our hypothesis, we conduct a content analysis of the 2013 and 2020 editions of the Science of Military Strategy and the 2019 Ministry of Defence white paper. We found links between deterrence strategy trends and cultural philosophies, concluding that the CPC deterrence policy has shifted.

Suggested Citation

  • Nate Ostdiek & Edward Torres & John Vonnes & Michelle Black-Dirks, 2026. "Limited Deterrence: The Emerging (Preferred) Chinese Deterrence Strategy," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 13(3), pages 319-341, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:13:y:2026:i:3:p:319-341
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970261443741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970261443741
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970261443741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:13:y:2026:i:3:p:319-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.