IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v12y2025i3p340-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions, Positions and Realities in India–China Relations: A Zero-sum Game of Repeated Distrust

Author

Listed:
  • Josukutty CA
  • Amina Reem VP

Abstract

India–China relations are shaped by cultural legacies, historical perceptions, border positions, and contemporary realities that have fostered a sense of uncertainty and deep mistrust for the last seven decades and beyond. The dilemma, rooted in the question of greatness or cultural superiority, extends into border disputes and subsequently to broader geopolitical calculus and games in the context of Asia’s rise. These narratives are characterised by distrust, and hence, bilateral interactions, especially on the border, are played out on the logic of a zero-sum game. The insights of Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) theory, through a standard four-by-four payoff matrix, are used to capture the nuances of this erratic and zero-sum pattern in India–China relations. We argue that the PD is internalised in India–China behaviour, starting from cultural and historical perceptions to border disputes and overlapping into contemporary geopolitical dynamics of competition and rivalry. This explains why India–China relations remain unresolved. We also argue that the lingering tensions between India and China are rooted in differing perceptions and positions, which compel them to choose a dominant strategy based on individual rationality instead of a Pareto-optimal outcome based on collective rationality.

Suggested Citation

  • Josukutty CA & Amina Reem VP, 2025. "Perceptions, Positions and Realities in India–China Relations: A Zero-sum Game of Repeated Distrust," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 12(3), pages 340-363, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:340-363
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970251347721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970251347721
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970251347721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:340-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.