IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v12y2025i2p197-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Foreign Leadership and Alignment Trade-offs: The Case of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Hung Tsai
  • Shane Hsuan-Yu Lin

Abstract

This article examines how Taiwanese citizens’ confidence in foreign leaders influences their preferences for aligning with China or the United States, particularly in national security and economic development. Situated at the centre of escalating US–China rivalry, Taiwan must balance security reliance on the United States with economic interdependence with China. Utilising patron–client theory, we explore how leadership evaluations—specifically, public confidence in President Xi Jinping and President Joe Biden—affect Taiwanese alignment preferences. Drawing on both constructivist and realist perspectives, we argue that these evaluations reflect broader identity-based and strategic interests, shaping preferences for alignment. Using data from a 2023 national survey, we find that greater confidence in President Xi corresponds with support for closer ties with China, while greater confidence in President Biden aligns with favouring stronger relations with the United States. These findings highlight the importance of foreign leadership perceptions in shaping public foreign policy attitudes and underscore the role of individual-level evaluations within asymmetric power dynamics. By integrating insights on leadership traits with patron–client relationships, this study contributes to understanding how public sentiment regarding Taiwan’s foreign policy direction is influenced by perceptions of superpower leaders amid growing strategic tensions between the United States and China.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Hung Tsai & Shane Hsuan-Yu Lin, 2025. "Perceptions of Foreign Leadership and Alignment Trade-offs: The Case of Taiwan," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 12(2), pages 197-220, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:197-220
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970251335411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970251335411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970251335411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:197-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.