IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v12y2025i2p197-220.html

Perceptions of Foreign Leadership and Alignment Trade-offs: The Case of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Hung Tsai
  • Shane Hsuan-Yu Lin

Abstract

This article examines how Taiwanese citizens’ confidence in foreign leaders influences their preferences for aligning with China or the United States, particularly in national security and economic development. Situated at the centre of escalating US–China rivalry, Taiwan must balance security reliance on the United States with economic interdependence with China. Utilising patron–client theory, we explore how leadership evaluations—specifically, public confidence in President Xi Jinping and President Joe Biden—affect Taiwanese alignment preferences. Drawing on both constructivist and realist perspectives, we argue that these evaluations reflect broader identity-based and strategic interests, shaping preferences for alignment. Using data from a 2023 national survey, we find that greater confidence in President Xi corresponds with support for closer ties with China, while greater confidence in President Biden aligns with favouring stronger relations with the United States. These findings highlight the importance of foreign leadership perceptions in shaping public foreign policy attitudes and underscore the role of individual-level evaluations within asymmetric power dynamics. By integrating insights on leadership traits with patron–client relationships, this study contributes to understanding how public sentiment regarding Taiwan’s foreign policy direction is influenced by perceptions of superpower leaders amid growing strategic tensions between the United States and China.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Hung Tsai & Shane Hsuan-Yu Lin, 2025. "Perceptions of Foreign Leadership and Alignment Trade-offs: The Case of Taiwan," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 12(2), pages 197-220, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:197-220
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970251335411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970251335411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970251335411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc J. Hetherington & Jason A. Husser, 2012. "How Trust Matters: The Changing Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 312-325, April.
    2. Overholt, William H., 2016. "China and the evolution of the world economy," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 267-271.
    3. Deepak Bhattasali & Shantong Li & Will Martin, 2004. "China and the WTO : Accession, Policy Reform, and Poverty Reduction Strategies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14920, April.
    4. Kinder, Donald R. & Kiewiet, D. Roderick, 1981. "Sociotropic Politics: The American Case," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 129-161, April.
    5. Checkel, Jeffrey T., 2005. "International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 801-826, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2021. "Can Political Trust Weaken the Relationship between Perceived Environmental Threats and Perceived Nuclear Threats? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Jason Barabas, 1998. "Wage Erosion, Economic Assessments, and Social Welfare Opinions," JCPR Working Papers 56, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    3. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    5. Anne Marie Jeannet, 2017. "The Rational Public? Internal Migration and Collective Opinion about the European Union," Working Papers 103, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
    6. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    7. Mark Pollack & Emilie Hafner-Burton, 2010. "Mainstreaming international governance: The environment, gender, and IO performance in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 285-313, September.
    8. Anna van der Vleuten, 2020. "Contestations of Transgender Rights and/in the Strasbourg Court," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 278-289.
    9. Vennemo, Haakon & Aunan, Kristin & He, Jianwu & Hu, Tao & Li, Shantong & Rypdal, Kristin, 2008. "Erratum to "Environmental impacts of China's WTO-accession [Ecological Economics 64 (2008) 893-911]," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 712-712, July.
    10. Yannis Papadopoulos, 2018. "How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 431-450, December.
    11. Constantinos Stephanou, 2008. "Liberalization of Trade in Financial Services : Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean," World Bank Publications - Reports 6280, The World Bank Group.
    12. Liesbet Hooghe & Tobias Lenz & Gary Marks, 2019. "Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 731-743, December.
    13. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    14. Akhlaq Ahmad & Farhan Navid Yousaf & Mazhar Iqbal Bhatti, 2019. "Political Trust and Efficacy among Educated Youth in Pakistan," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(2), pages 386-391, June.
    15. Oude Groeniger, Joost & Noordzij, Kjell & van der Waal, Jeroen & de Koster, Willem, 2021. "Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    16. repec:wti:papers:1406 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Chun-Fang Chiang & Jason M. Kuo & Megumi Naoi & Jin-Tan Liu, 2020. "What Do Voters Learn from Foreign News? Emulation, Backlash, and Public Support for Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 27497, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Muhammad Khalil Khan & Imran Ali Sandano & Cornelius B. Pratt & Tahir Farid, 2018. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Global Model for an Evolving Approach to Sustainable Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Rose, Richard, 2007. "Evaluating democratic governance: A bottom up approach to European Union enlargement," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2007-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. Schäfer, David, 2016. "A banking union of ideas? The impact of ordoliberalism and the vicious circle on the EU banking union," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65875, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Quamrul Alam & Mohammad Yusuf & Ken Coghill, 2011. "Does unilateral liberalization promote WTO GATS commitment? Cross-country evidence from the telecommunications sector," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 29-49.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:197-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.