IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v11y2024i3p320-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simmering Storm in the East China Sea: Shifting Dynamics in the Great Power Rivalries of East Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Ra Mason
  • Soul Park

Abstract

The East China Sea (ECS) is one of the region’s most significant and oft-times under-addressed potential flashpoints. In this article we take a holistic approach and reexamine the recent actions of East Asia’s two most significant powers, China and Japan, in relation to this important body of maritime space, as well as those of the United States (US), as the incumbent regional hegemon. Specifically, we examine the efficacy of each. This highlights a dynamism in Chinese actions, as well as elucidating how the US and Japan have come to adopt policies that are of dubious efficacy as a means of alleviating or nullifying the escalation of unwanted tensions across the ECS. In so doing, we draw upon two key concepts, immobilism and confirmation bias, that help us to understand why the US and Japan are failing to achieve their assumed objectives of regional stability and the maintenance of the status quo. Ultimately, we argue that a combination of immobilism and confirmation bias in American and Japanese foreign policy, in response to the greater dynamism and adaptability of regional great powers such as China, has led to latent changes in the status quo that risk undermining stability across the ECS.

Suggested Citation

  • Ra Mason & Soul Park, 2024. "Simmering Storm in the East China Sea: Shifting Dynamics in the Great Power Rivalries of East Asia," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 11(3), pages 320-344, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:11:y:2024:i:3:p:320-344
    DOI: 10.1177/23477970241261424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477970241261424
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477970241261424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:11:y:2024:i:3:p:320-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.