IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v713y2024i1p68-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Chief Justice John Roberts an Institutionalist? A Historical Institutionalist Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rogers M. Smith

Abstract

Chief Justice John Roberts is often called an “institutionalist,†indicating that he places the good of the Supreme Court as a governing institution over his own political preferences. This description is true only to a limited extent. The historical institutionalist analysis presented here shows that Roberts’s priority is to advance his version of the modern conservative legal movement’s vision of the Constitution, and that he protects the judiciary as an institution in the service of that cause. But because many Americans do not share that vision of constitutionalism, and because its endorsement of executive power may undermine judicial authority, the decisions of the Roberts court may only compound the difficulties facing both the court and the country today. I also discuss implications of the Chief Justice’s disposition, both for the court and for the nation’s evolving conception of constitutionalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogers M. Smith, 2024. "Is Chief Justice John Roberts an Institutionalist? A Historical Institutionalist Analysis," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 713(1), pages 68-87, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:713:y:2024:i:1:p:68-87
    DOI: 10.1177/00027162251324364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162251324364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00027162251324364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:713:y:2024:i:1:p:68-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.