IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v707y2023i1p256-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problem with “Most People†: Racism and Ableism in U.S. COVID-19 Public Health Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Amelia N. Gibson

Abstract

Public health communication related to COVID-19 does not typically address the needs of “high-risk†Americans. Rather, pandemic-era policy has prioritized those who have the lowest risks for complications and mortality—white, nondisabled, employed, housed, middle- to high-income American citizens with private health insurance. This article addresses whether commonly held definitions of misinformation and “health literacy†are useful when public health communication does not meaningfully address the needs of chronically ill and disabled individuals. It considers strategies used by marginalized people to assess and understand medical advice, workplace provisions, and education policies that typically assume low risk and ignore comorbidities. It argues that the U.S. should build a more equitable public health communication infrastructure that collects and reports on race- and disability-specific data, accounts for complexity in crisis communication, and targets the needs of communities that are most heavily impacted by public health threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Amelia N. Gibson, 2023. "The Problem with “Most People†: Racism and Ableism in U.S. COVID-19 Public Health Communication," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 707(1), pages 256-265, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:707:y:2023:i:1:p:256-265
    DOI: 10.1177/00027162231219334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162231219334
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00027162231219334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:707:y:2023:i:1:p:256-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.