IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v695y2021i1p225-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Labor Market Institutions Matter for Worker Compensation

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Nunn
  • Jennifer Hunt

Abstract

Labor markets deviate substantially from the competitive ideal, and policies and institutions affect workers’ outcomes. Over the last 45 years, the dramatic increase in compensation of high earners and weak or stagnant growth for low and middle earners have shone a spotlight on the ways in which labor market institutions sometimes work to the detriment of lower-paid workers. In this article, we survey several institutions—minimum wages, private sector unions, noncompete agreements, and occupational licensing—considering how they have evolved in ways that affect workers’ outcomes, given that the labor market is characterized by uneven distribution of market gains. We describe the modern labor market as one that substantially features alternative work arrangements and labor market concentration, and we consider the implications of this for public policy. Those policies, along with the surveyed institutions, are the focus of our final section that discusses key options for improving worker outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Nunn & Jennifer Hunt, 2021. "How Labor Market Institutions Matter for Worker Compensation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 695(1), pages 225-241, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:695:y:2021:i:1:p:225-241
    DOI: 10.1177/00027162211035965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162211035965
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00027162211035965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:695:y:2021:i:1:p:225-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.