IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v691y2020i1p295-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Logics of Hybrid Accountability: When the State, the Market, and Professionalism Interact

Author

Listed:
  • Avishai Benish

Abstract

The delivery of public services increasingly operates under hybrid accountability regimes, but we have much to learn about how these regimes interrelate. I develop a framework for systematic analysis of hybrid public, market, and professional accountability arrangements, looking at the compatibility of their content, steering mechanisms, and relationships. The analysis is informed and illustrated by empirical studies on accountability in welfare state services, which offer evidence on hybrid accountability arrangements. The article concludes by discussing the interplay between accountability regimes and the conditions in which they undermine or reinforce each other. I argue that compatibility between regimes depends on the content of accountability rather than on the accountability mechanisms, and I highlight the importance of the trust between the parties entering into accountability relations and the proximity of their institutional logics.

Suggested Citation

  • Avishai Benish, 2020. "The Logics of Hybrid Accountability: When the State, the Market, and Professionalism Interact," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 691(1), pages 295-310, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:691:y:2020:i:1:p:295-310
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716220965905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716220965905
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716220965905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:691:y:2020:i:1:p:295-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.