IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v687y2020i1p89-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Position and Police Who Shoot

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Zhao
  • Andrew V. Papachristos

Abstract

This study applies the growing field of network science to explore whether police violence is associated with characteristics of an officer’s social networks and his or her placement within those networks. To do this, we re-create the network of police misconduct for the Chicago Police Department using more than 38,442 complaints filed against police officers between 2000 and 2003. Our statistical models reveal that officers who shoot at civilians are often “brokers†within the social networks of policing, occupying important positions between other actors in the network and often connecting otherwise disconnected parts of the social structure between other officers within larger networks of misconduct. This finding holds, even net measures of officer activity, career movement, and sociodemographic background. Our finding suggest that policies and interventions aimed at curbing police shootings should include not only individual assessments of risk but also an understanding of officers’ positions within larger social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Zhao & Andrew V. Papachristos, 2020. "Network Position and Police Who Shoot," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 687(1), pages 89-112, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:89-112
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219901171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219901171
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219901171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:89-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.