IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v687y2020i1p202-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconciling Police and Communities with Apologies, Acknowledgements, or Both: A Controlled Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas C. O’Brien
  • Tracey L. Meares
  • Tom R. Tyler

Abstract

When police officers harm civilians, police leadership almost invariably makes a public statement about the incident, and these communications usually address issues of public mistrust in the police. In addressing public mistrust, political pressures may motivate police leadership to avoid acknowledging the role of police in creating that distrust. The study reported in this article examines the consequences of avoiding versus acknowledging responsibility for the role of police in creating mistrust, along with issuing an apology or not issuing an apology, in public statements. How do these various kinds of gestures shape public cooperation with police? This study reports on an experiment designed to answer that question, with our analysis focusing on the impact of these various kinds of statements on the people who are least likely to trust police. The evidence suggests that police leaders should combine acknowledgement of responsibility for the mistrust with an apology if they want to enlist the cooperation of people who are least likely to trust the police.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas C. O’Brien & Tracey L. Meares & Tom R. Tyler, 2020. "Reconciling Police and Communities with Apologies, Acknowledgements, or Both: A Controlled Experiment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 687(1), pages 202-215, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:202-215
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716220904659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716220904659
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716220904659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:202-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.