IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v687y2020i1p146-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moving beyond “Best Practice†: Experiences in Police Reform and a Call for Evidence to Reduce Officer-Involved Shootings

Author

Listed:
  • Robin S. Engel
  • Hannah D. McManus
  • Gabrielle T. Isaza

Abstract

In post-Ferguson America, police departments are being challenged to implement evidence-based changes in policies and training to reduce fatal police-citizen encounters. Of the litany of recommendations believed to reduce police shootings, five have garnered widespread support: body-worn cameras, de-escalation training, implicit bias training, early intervention systems, and civilian oversight. These highly endorsed interventions, however, are not supported by a strong body of empirical evidence that demonstrates their effectiveness. Guided by the available research on evidence-based policing and informed by the firsthand experience of one of the authors in implementing departmental reforms that followed the fatal shooting of a civilian by an officer, this article highlights promising reform strategies and opportunities to build the evidence base for effective use-of-force reforms. We call upon police executives to engage in evidence-based policing by scientifically testing interventions, and we call on academics to engage in rapid research responses for critical issues in policing.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin S. Engel & Hannah D. McManus & Gabrielle T. Isaza, 2020. "Moving beyond “Best Practice†: Experiences in Police Reform and a Call for Evidence to Reduce Officer-Involved Shootings," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 687(1), pages 146-165, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:146-165
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219889328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219889328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219889328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:146-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.