IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v683y2019i1p58-74.html

Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: The U.S. Example

Author

Listed:
  • Erin M. Fahle
  • Benjamin R. Shear
  • Kenneth A. Shores

Abstract

Standardized tests are regularly used as education system monitoring tools to compare the average performance of students living in different states or belonging to different subgroups (e.g., defined by race/ethnicity, sex, or parental income) and to track their progress over time. This article describes some uses and design features of tests in system monitoring contexts. We provide the example of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), the only large-scale system monitoring test in the United States. The availability of NAEP data, in turn, has facilitated the construction of the Stanford Education Data Archive (SEDA), a publicly available database that can be used to describe patterns of achievement for nearly all school districts in the United States. Here, we discuss progress in and challenges to the use of standardized tests as system monitoring tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin M. Fahle & Benjamin R. Shear & Kenneth A. Shores, 2019. "Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: The U.S. Example," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 58-74, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:683:y:2019:i:1:p:58-74
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219841014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219841014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219841014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanna Loeb & Erika Byun, 2019. "Testing, Accountability, and School Improvement," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 94-109, May.
    2. Henry I. Braun & Judith D. Singer, 2019. "Assessment for Monitoring of Education Systems: International Comparisons," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 75-92, May.
    3. Brian A. Jacob, 2007. "Test-Based Accountability and Student Achievement: An Investigation of Differential Performance on NAEP and State Assessments," NBER Working Papers 12817, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Thomas S. Dee & Brian Jacob, 2011. "The impact of no Child Left Behind on student achievement," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 418-446, June.
    5. Eric A. Hanushek, 2019. "Testing, Accountability, and the American Economy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 110-128, May.
    6. Richard J. Murnane & John B. Willett & Yves Duhaldeborde & John H. Tyler, 2000. "How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 547-568.
    7. C. Kirabo Jackson, 2018. "What Do Test Scores Miss? The Importance of Teacher Effects on Non–Test Score Outcomes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(5), pages 2072-2107.
    8. Maris A. Vinovskis, 2019. "History of Testing in the United States: PK–12 Education," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 22-37, May.
    9. Julien Lafortune & Jesse Rothstein & Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, 2018. "School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, April.
    10. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    11. Yona Rubinstein & James J. Heckman, 2001. "The Importance of Noncognitive Skills: Lessons from the GED Testing Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(2), pages 145-149, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric A. Hanushek, 2019. "Testing, Accountability, and the American Economy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 110-128, May.
    2. Preeya P. Mbekeani & John P. Papay & Ann Mantil & Richard J. Murnane, 2026. "Understanding High Schools’ Effects on Longer‐Term Outcomes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(2), March.
    3. Jo Blanden & Matthias Doepke & Jan Stuhler, 2022. "Education inequality," CEP Discussion Papers dp1849, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Nitin Kumar Bharti & Samreen Malik & Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay & Nishith Prakash, 2026. "Science on the Move: How Experiential Pedagogy Shapes Human Capital," CESifo Working Paper Series 12691, CESifo.
    5. Zölitz, Ulf & Sorrenti, Giuseppe & Ribeaud, Denis & Eisner, Manuel, 2020. "The Causal Impact of Socio-Emotional Skills Training on Educational Success," CEPR Discussion Papers 14523, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    6. Susanna Loeb & Erika Byun, 2019. "Testing, Accountability, and School Improvement," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 94-109, May.
    7. Gregg, John J. & Lavertu, Stéphane, 2023. "Test-based accountability and educational equity: Breaking through local district politics?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Carolina Caetano & Gregorio Caetano & Eric R. Nielsen, 2020. "Should Children Do More Enrichment Activities? Leveraging Bunching to Correct for Endogeneity," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2020-036, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    9. Richardson, J.T., 2015. "Accountability incentives and academic achievement: Distributional impacts of accountability when standards are set low," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-16.
    10. Mikko Silliman & Juuso Mäkinen, 2026. "Life-cycle effects of public childcare: Evidence on children and their parents," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26004, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    11. Loviglio, Annalisa, 2023. "School Quality beyond Test Scores: The Role of Schools in Shaping Educational Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 16111, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Christina Langer & Simon Wiederhold, 2023. "The Value of Early-Career Skills," Working Papers 222, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    13. Ludger Woessmann, 2024. "Skills and Earnings: A Multidimensional Perspective on Human Capital," CESifo Working Paper Series 11428, CESifo.
    14. Josh B. McGee, 2023. "Yes, money matters, but the details can make all the difference," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 1125-1132, September.
    15. David J. Deming & Mikko I. Silliman, 2024. "Skills and Human Capital in the Labor Market," NBER Working Papers 32908, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Morando, Greta & Sen, Sonkurt, 2025. "Teacher Gender Effects on Students’ Socio-Emotional Skills," IZA Discussion Papers 17953, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Matthew A Lenard & Mikko Silliman, 2025. "Informal social interactions, academic achievement and behavior: Evidence from peers on the school bus," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 135(671), pages 2359-2373.
    18. Dinand Webbink & José María Cabrera, 2016. "Do higher salaries yield better teachers and better student outcomes?," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1604, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    19. Elke Lüdemann, 2011. "Schooling and the Formation of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Outcomes," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 39, April.
    20. Ferman, Bruno & Fontes, Luiz Felipe, 2020. "Discriminating Behavior: Evidence from teachers’ grading bias," MPRA Paper 100400, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:683:y:2019:i:1:p:58-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.