IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v683y2019i1p201-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment to Promote Equity and Epistemic Justice: A Use-Case of a Research-Practice Partnership in Science Education

Author

Listed:
  • William R. Penuel
  • Douglas A. Watkins

Abstract

Efforts to align educational assessments with the sociocultural foundations of learning and with instruction are limited because we lack evidence of how such systems can be developed and maintained in inherently complex educational settings. Credible use cases are helpful to developing the evidence base, and we present one here: a research-practice partnership between a university and a large urban school district. The goals of our codesigned system include supporting the redistribution of educational opportunities in science classrooms (equity) and supporting and repairing students’ self-perceptions as agents of knowing and reasoning in science classrooms and in the community (epistemic justice). We describe components of the partnership and educational practices that work together to accomplish these aims: curricula with embedded assessments allowing students to figure out rather than be told core ideas, exit tickets that elicit students’ classroom experience, and an instructional guidance system focused on iterative refinement of teacher learning opportunities to support student agency.

Suggested Citation

  • William R. Penuel & Douglas A. Watkins, 2019. "Assessment to Promote Equity and Epistemic Justice: A Use-Case of a Research-Practice Partnership in Science Education," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 201-216, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:683:y:2019:i:1:p:201-216
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219843249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219843249
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219843249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:683:y:2019:i:1:p:201-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.