IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v683y2019i1p149-161.html

Assessment for Special Education: Diagnosis and Placement

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer R. Frey

Abstract

Over the last 40 years, federal legislation has led to improved access to public education for students with disabilities. Today, more than six million students receive special education and related services through American public schools; however, evaluation practices for eligibility determination largely have remained unchanged. Assessment approaches used for identification, program planning, and evaluation of progress, arguably, have been insensitive to cultural differences, contributing to disproportional representation of children from different backgrounds in specific special education disability categories, and inefficient because they are too broad to immediately inform instructional planning for both students within and across disability categories. This article critiques current practices for identifying children for special education services and offers considerations, grounded in developmental and cognitive neuroscience, that could lead to more useful assessment approaches that optimize all students’ learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer R. Frey, 2019. "Assessment for Special Education: Diagnosis and Placement," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 149-161, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:683:y:2019:i:1:p:149-161
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716219841352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716219841352
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716219841352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J. Mislevy, 2019. "Advances in Measurement and Cognition," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 164-182, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William R. Penuel & Douglas A. Watkins, 2019. "Assessment to Promote Equity and Epistemic Justice: A Use-Case of a Research-Practice Partnership in Science Education," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 201-216, May.
    2. Knut Neumann & Horst Schecker & Heike Theyßen, 2019. "Assessing Complex Patterns of Student Resources and Behavior in the Large Scale," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 683(1), pages 233-249, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:683:y:2019:i:1:p:149-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.