IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v681y2019i1p228-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections: Can American Democracy Still Be Saved?

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Bermeo

Abstract

This article reflects on whether the erosion of democracy in the contemporary United States can be halted. Using the cases and conclusions from McCoy and Somer’s eleven country collective project, it argues that democracy’s decline is not inevitable. A case for cautious optimism emerges from analyzing the coalitions around democracy’s disassemblers and democracy’s defenders. The actors disassembling democracy have activated cleavages and adopted a style of rule that exacerbates fault-lines on the Right. The actors defending democracy have thus far done what’s needed to eventually build the sort of winning coalition that has proven successful elsewhere. Creating broad, cross-class networks, mobilizing peaceful protest, and drawing on mass values that are still supportive of democracy bolster the likelihood of successful defense.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Bermeo, 2019. "Reflections: Can American Democracy Still Be Saved?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 228-233, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:681:y:2019:i:1:p:228-233
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716218818083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716218818083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716218818083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:681:y:2019:i:1:p:228-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.