IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v607y2006i1p103-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mathematical Model of the Risk of Nuclear Terrorism

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Bunn

    (Project on Managing the Atom in the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy)

Abstract

This article presents a mathematical model for measuring the global risk of nuclear theft and terrorism. One plausible set of parameter values used in a numerical example suggests a 29 percent probability of a nuclear terrorist attack in the next decade. The expected loss over that period would be $1.17 trillion (undiscounted), or more than $100 billion per year. Historical and other evidence is used to explore the likely values of several of the key parameters, and policy options for reducing the risk are briefly assessed. The uncertainties in estimating the risk of nuclear terrorism are very large, but even a risk dramatically smaller than that estimated in the numerical example used in this article would justify a broad range of actions to reduce the threat.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Bunn, 2006. "A Mathematical Model of the Risk of Nuclear Terrorism," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 607(1), pages 103-120, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:607:y:2006:i:1:p:103-120
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716206290182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716206290182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716206290182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Bunn & Anthony Wier, 2006. "Terrorist Nuclear Weapon Construction: How Difficult?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 607(1), pages 133-149, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Bunn & Anthony Wier, 2006. "Terrorist Nuclear Weapon Construction: How Difficult?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 607(1), pages 133-149, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:607:y:2006:i:1:p:103-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.