IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v599y2005i1p147-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place-Based Randomized Trials to Test the Effects on Instructional Practices of a Mathematics/ Science Professional Development Program for Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew C. Porter

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Rolf K. Blank

    (Council of Chief State School Officers)

  • John L. Smithson

    (Wisconsin Center for Education Research)

  • Eric Osthoff

    (Wisconsin Center for Education Research at the University ofWisconsin–Madison; Los Angeles Unified School District)

Abstract

Aprofessional development model was designed for and is being tested in approximately fifty U.S. middle schools in five large urban districts, with half in each district randomly assigned to receive the two-year treatment. Each school forms a mathematics/science leadership team of five to seven members, including at least one administrator. Teams receive professional development in district-level workshops, then work with all math and science teachers in their school. The core idea is to provide teachers with data on their instructional practices and student achievement, then teach them how to use that data to improve their effectiveness. This article documents the successes and failures of treatment implementation and the collection of baseline and outcome data. The focus is on learning about doing place-based randomized trials to test the efficacy of education programs. At the time of this writing, treatment is not yet complete and study results are not available.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew C. Porter & Rolf K. Blank & John L. Smithson & Eric Osthoff, 2005. "Place-Based Randomized Trials to Test the Effects on Instructional Practices of a Mathematics/ Science Professional Development Program for Teachers," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 599(1), pages 147-175, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:599:y:2005:i:1:p:147-175
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716205274743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716205274743
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716205274743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:599:y:2005:i:1:p:147-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.