IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v589y2003i1p190-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimates of Randomized Controlled Trials Across Six Areas of Childhood Intervention: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Petrosino

Abstract

Data on the frequency of experiments are elusive. One way to estimate how many experiments are done is by analyzing the contents of bibliographic databases. This article analyzes the citation information from six major bibliographic databases to estimate the proportion of randomized (or possibly randomized) experiments compared to all outcome or impact evaluation studies. The focus of the article is on the evaluation of programs designed for children (from birth to eighteen years of age). The results indicate that randomized studies are used in nearly 70 percent of childhood interventions in health care but probably in 6 to 15 percent of kindergarten through twelfth-grade interventions in education and juvenile justice. The article concludes with discussion about these data, particularly on suggestions of how to produce more outcome studies, and randomized experiments, of childhood interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Petrosino, 2003. "Estimates of Randomized Controlled Trials Across Six Areas of Childhood Intervention: A Bibliometric Analysis," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 190-202, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:589:y:2003:i:1:p:190-202
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716203254694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716203254694
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716203254694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carol Taylor Fitz-Gibbon, 1999. "Education: High Potential Not Yet Realized," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 33-40, January.
    2. David P. Farrington, 2003. "British Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 150-167, September.
    3. Geraldine Macdonald, 1999. "Evidence-Based Social Care: Wheels off the Runway?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 25-32, January.
    4. Joan McCord, 2003. "Cures That Harm: Unanticipated Outcomes of Crime Prevention Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 16-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Petrosino & Robert F. Boruch & Haluk Soydan & Lorna Duggan & Julio Sanchez-Meca, 2001. "Meeting the Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy: The Campbell Collaboration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 14-34, November.
    2. Lawrence W. Sherman, 2005. "The Use and Usefulness of Criminology, 1751-2005: Enlightened Justice and Its Failures," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 600(1), pages 115-135, July.
    3. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Sue-Ming Yang, 2003. "When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work†?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 31-48, May.
    4. Green, David A. & Simard-Duplain, Gaëlle & Sweetman, Arthur & Warburton, William P., 2023. "A Scientific Approach to Addressing Social Issues Using Administrative Data," IZA Policy Papers 199, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Kevin Petersen & Robert C. Davis & David Weisburd & Bruce Taylor, 2022. "Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    6. Dominic Pearson & David Torgerson & Cynthia McDougall & Roger Bowles, 2010. "Parable of Two Agencies, One of Which Randomizes," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 628(1), pages 11-29, March.
    7. Lawrence W. Sherman, 2003. "Misleading Evidence and Evidence-Led Policy: Making Social Science more Experimental," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 6-19, September.
    8. Friedrich Lösel & Andreas Beelmann, 2003. "Effects of Child Skills Training in Preventing Antisocial Behavior: A Systematic Review of Randomized Evaluations," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 84-109, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:589:y:2003:i:1:p:190-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.