IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v583y2002i1p29-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy, the Public, and Priorities in Alternative Medicine Research

Author

Listed:
  • Wayne B. Jonas

    (Department of Family Medicine at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland)

Abstract

The political and social dynamics around unconventional or complementary and alternative medical practices has shifted from marginalization to a struggle for control of definitions and priorities. These practices have arisen because of public rather than professional or scientific interest. Conventional medicine has made significant gains in health care for acute disease, translating basic science into diagnostic and therapeutic value, and improving public health. These gains have been accompanied by high costs, depersonalization, and side effects. Complementary medicine has aligned with public preferences for more natural, lower-cost, and more holistic health care practices. Attempts to integrate the concepts and practices of complementary and alternative medicine into biomedicine present significant challenges for determining how language, funding, and standards of evidence are established. The author outlines some of the issues that arise in the struggle to integrate these practices into biomedicine and suggests some criteria for establishing priorities when funding research in complementary and alternative medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Wayne B. Jonas, 2002. "Policy, the Public, and Priorities in Alternative Medicine Research," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 583(1), pages 29-43, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:583:y:2002:i:1:p:29-43
    DOI: 10.1177/000271620258300103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271620258300103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271620258300103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:583:y:2002:i:1:p:29-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.