IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v568y2000i1p154-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anthropological Measurement: The Mismeasure of African Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Fatimah L.C. Jackson

    (University of Maryland)

Abstract

W.E.B. Du Bois's prophetic century-old statements on America's unwillingness to fairly assess its citizens of African descent still provide important insights into the continuing philosophical and methodological problems of Western anthropology and biology. Too frequently, the bias of a "problem of the color line" mentality undermines the accurate measurement, analysis, and valid scientific interpretations of human variation. The history of biological anthropology is replete with instances of "virtual science" being used to camouflage a political and social agenda. Today, as the post-genome era approaches, arbitrary and often capricious evaluations of Africans and African Americans still abound, as Du Bois had predicted. New paradigms such as ethnogenetic layering are proposed to disentangle cultural identity from genetic identity and provide an alternative to static, stereotype-dependent racial models of traditional anthropology and biology. Ethnogenetic layering has been applied in ecological risk assessment studies and has already revealed significant regional biodiversity (genetic substructuring) among African Americans.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatimah L.C. Jackson, 2000. "Anthropological Measurement: The Mismeasure of African Americans," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 568(1), pages 154-171, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:568:y:2000:i:1:p:154-171
    DOI: 10.1177/000271620056800112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271620056800112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271620056800112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:568:y:2000:i:1:p:154-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.