IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v560y1998i1p129-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manipulating Public Opinion with Moral Justification

Author

Listed:
  • KATHLEEN M. McGRAW

Abstract

Justifications that invoke moral claims are highly effective in shaping public opinion. But moral justifications (“I am obeying the dictates of my conscience†; “This policy is in the community's best interests†) are difficult to verify as to their truthfulness, raising the possibility that they can be used deceptively. In this article, the psychological and political literatures are reviewed to illustrate why it is so difficult to detect deceptive moral justifications. The difficulty arises because (1) people are not very good at detecting deception in general; (2) the mediated nature of political communication eliminates the nonverbal cues that are most predictive of deception; (3) social judgment biases lead people to focus on the individual and inhibit suspicion; (4) the norms of political culture constrain politicians from accusing each other of lying, so that the public is not prompted by other sources to regard moral claims with suspicion.

Suggested Citation

  • KATHLEEN M. McGRAW, 1998. "Manipulating Public Opinion with Moral Justification," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 560(1), pages 129-142, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:560:y:1998:i:1:p:129-142
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716298560001010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716298560001010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716298560001010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:560:y:1998:i:1:p:129-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.