IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v537y1995i1p163-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perceptions of Ethics in Government

Author

Listed:
  • H. GEORGE FREDERICKSON
  • DAVID G. FREDERICKSON

Abstract

To explain negative perceptions of government ethics, and particularly of the ethics of public administrators, the authors use the paradox of distance and the absence of role differentiation. In the paradox of distance, the public holds negative views of government generally and public administrators in the abstract, but they have favorable to very favorable views of governmental programs with which they interact and favorable views of the bureaucrats whom they encounter. Much of the negative perception of government ethics and the ethics of public officials is based on public observations of the misdeeds of those who are elected or politically appointed. These negative perceptions are well founded. Unfortunately, the public holds similarly negative views of merit civil servants, although these public officials are much less often associated with corruption or unethical behavior. Finally, the authors suggest that several contemporary governmental reforms will, in the long run, result in more rather than less government corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • H. George Frederickson & David G. Frederickson, 1995. "Public Perceptions of Ethics in Government," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 537(1), pages 163-172, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:537:y:1995:i:1:p:163-172
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716295537000014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716295537000014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716295537000014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:537:y:1995:i:1:p:163-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.