IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v508y1990i1p119-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualified Public Support for Bilingual Education: Some Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • LEONIE HUDDY
  • DAVID O. SEARS

Abstract

Bilingual education has become politicized. It is surrounded by controversy, the outcome of which may play a greater role in deciding its future as an educational program than its educational successes. To better understand this political debate and its possible outcome, the present article examines attitudes toward bilingual education among the Anglo majority, in terms of general support levels, the origins of support, and its future trajectory. We find that currently the majority feels moderately positive toward bilingual education. Opposition is greatest among those who have generally negative attitudes toward minority groups and immigrants and who oppose special favors for them and among those who oppose increased government spending and spending on foreign-language instruction. Anglos' actual personal experience with bilingual education plays only a minor role. Opposition is greater among the well informed, suggesting that opposition may increase further as the issue attains greater national visibility. Opposition is also likely to increase if bilingual education is presented as promoting linguistic and cultural maintenance among language-minority students rather than as a mechanism for teaching English.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonie Huddy & David O. Sears, 1990. "Qualified Public Support for Bilingual Education: Some Policy Implications," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 508(1), pages 119-134, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:508:y:1990:i:1:p:119-134
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716290508001010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716290508001010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716290508001010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:508:y:1990:i:1:p:119-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.