IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v486y1986i1p132-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Of Philosophers, Foxes, and Finances: Can the Federal Election Commission Ever Do an Adequate Job?

Author

Listed:
  • WILLIAM C. OLDAKER

Abstract

This article assesses the effectiveness of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in today's environment by discussing three types of constraints that limit the FEC's authority: contextual, legal, and administrative. The contextual restraint is seen in the unique political position in which the FEC finds itself, regulating its maker and benefactor, the Congress. The legal constraints involve the First Amendment and its interplay with the statutes that the FEC administers. Finally, the article addresses the administrative constraints under which the FEC must labor, and it examines two frequent charges against the commission: the politicalization of its enforcement procedure and the assertion that the FEC pursues petty infractions. The article concludes that the FEC deserves a mixed review, noting that it stumbles in its attempt to keep the foxes out of the chicken coop and the chickens in during congressional elections. The FEC must be made far more independent to be effective.

Suggested Citation

  • William C. Oldaker, 1986. "Of Philosophers, Foxes, and Finances: Can the Federal Election Commission Ever Do an Adequate Job?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 486(1), pages 132-145, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:486:y:1986:i:1:p:132-145
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716286486001011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716286486001011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716286486001011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:486:y:1986:i:1:p:132-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.