IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v475y1984i1p158-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ford and the UAW have a Better Idea: A Joint Labor-Management Approach to Plant Closings and Worker Retraining

Author

Listed:
  • GARY B. HANSEN

Abstract

Responding to the severe recession in the U.S. automobile industry in the late 1970s, Ford Motor Company and the United Automobile Workers negotiated, as part of their 1982 national agreement, innovative provisions to deal with the problems faced by redundant workers. This article outlines the basic components of the UAW-Ford model for plant closings and describes the implementation of the model at a San Jose site. The UAW-Ford approach is an example of best practice in the area of joint labor-management cooperation when dealing with the human resource problems of a plant closure. Among the lessons learned from the San Jose experience are the value of early advance notice; the importance of an external catalyst and source of technical assistance in getting the program under way and moving in the right direction; the necessity of good union and management leadership; the importance of on-site delivery of services to the displaced workers; the importance of frequent communication with the workers; the value of having a flexible, readily available resource base to underpin the readjustment program; and the employer's sense of responsibility in discharging obligations to the dislocated work force.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary B. Hansen, 1984. "Ford and the UAW have a Better Idea: A Joint Labor-Management Approach to Plant Closings and Worker Retraining," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 475(1), pages 158-174, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:475:y:1984:i:1:p:158-174
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716284475001012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716284475001012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716284475001012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:475:y:1984:i:1:p:158-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.